Why do you suppose that we are studying the Book of Acts?

It’s not in order to carve another notch on our the handle of our gun.

It’s not so that some day we can day, “Hey, we studied that book too!”

And we are not studying Acts in order to fill our minds with quaint or useless facts.

There might be a number of legitimate answers to the question,

But one that stands out near the top of the list would be:

As Baptists we are trying pattern our lives after the example that we have in the Word of God.

The “ecclesia” in Jerusalem was the very first of the churches of Jesus Christ.

We claim that our church descended from that church.

In some ways, the Lord Jesus didn’t start a bunch of different churches, even if they had been all Baptist in doctrine and practice.

Christ started one church.

“I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.”

Of course He was not talking about an unassembling assembly – a “universal church”

He was talking about all the individual congregations which would eventually derive their existence from the church that He established in Jerusalem.

Since the church that we are studying in Acts was the first of all the churches,

And in a sense the mother of all the rest,

It is incumbent upon us to know how it operated and to imitate it as best we can.

That is the reason that we are studying the Book of Acts.

This is the 50th message in our study so far.

To the best of my knowledge every outline that I have used has been “an original.”

In my notes, here, I put the words “an original” in quotations marks,

Because I’m not so foolish to think that there haven’t been a few other preachers before me

Who have preached through the Book of Acts.

I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that every one of those fifty message outlines have been preached a hundred times or more.

But I can tell you that I am not aware of any of those messages, and these outlines have come out of my heart and mind.

In regard to the message tonight, this verse divides so easily and so obviously, that probably every book of sermon outlines on Acts will have at least one message that sounds like this one.

Let’s think about four things:

The Work, the Subject, the Place and the Time.

First, the WORK.

The reason that we’ve been able to have 49 messages so far in this study, is because there has been at least a hundred different themes for us to cover.

But many of those messages dealt with theological details and their application.

For example, we’ve looked at glossolalia and the accusation of public drunkenness.

Unlike those messages, this verse and this sermon paint a very broad picture of that church.

Acts 5:42 is not an incidental detail, but rather the basic theme and work of the church.

This was what it was all about.

This was what it was created to do.

This was and continues to be the sum and substance of the Lord’s churches.

The work of that church was to teach and preach Christ Jesus.

And certainly at the very center of this work were the Apostles.

And certainly the antecedent to the pronoun “they” in the verse has to refer to the people who were beaten and who rejoiced to be counted worthy to suffer shame for the name of Christ.

But let’s not forget that many, if not all of the seventy preaching disciples under Jesus’ ministry were then members of this same church.

It is hard for me to think that those who had been preachers are now content to sit on their hands with duct tape over their mouths.

And then we move forward in time and we see people like Stephen and Philip.

We are going to see people elected to office of deacon, to help relieve the work-load of the Apostles.

But those same church-servants were also preachers whenever possible.

The first of the deacons in Acts 6:5 was eventually called “Philip the Evangelist.”

This business of teaching and preaching in every house was not confined to the twelve.

This was the work of the entire church, and every member to some degree was involved.

This is the way that should be in all of the Lord’s churches.

That does not mean that everyone is called or gifted to be a preacher.

According to Biblical definition, to preach is to publically announce, to declare, to proclaim and herald.

It was first on the list of exhortations to young Timothy was to “preach the Word.”

Philip preached Christ to the people of Samaria; and he preached Jesus to the Ethiopian

Paul told that Corinthians that he was sent to be preacher to them.

And he implored them to help him “to preach the gospel in the regions beyond.”

To the Colossians he said of Christ, “Whom we preach, warning every man, and teaching every man in all wisdom; that we may present every man perfect in Christ Jesus.”

And why all this talk about preaching?

Because it is arguably the most important human function in all the world.

“The preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.”

We have seen several examples of preaching thus far in the Book of Acts.

Peter publically and boldly stood and heralded the name and work of the Lord Jesus.

And on the Day of Pentecost the result was 3,000 souls surrendered to Christ.

And after the healing of the lame man in the gate of the temple, Peter preached once again, and this time over 5,000 souls came to Christ.

God has promised to bless, what the world calls “the foolishness of preaching.”

The Lord has never promised to greatly use Christian drama, or gospel cantatas, or Christian fiction.

I am not saying that the Lord can’t use these things or that He doesn’t from time to time.

But the Bible declares God’s approval and blessing on only two things; teaching and preaching,

With the emphasis on the preaching, at least in the evangelical reaching out sort of way.

But the Lord is also very interested in the TEACHING of Christ Jesus, as well.

Just outside of Calgary, Alberta there is a Baptist preacher who was once a member of the church that I pastored there.

I have mentioned him before, because when it comes to this subject, I can’t get him out of my mind.

He had a family of girls, whom he didn’t very often bring to Sunday School.

He explained that all he was interested in was my preaching, not my teaching.

He’d exhort me to “preach the word; to be instant in season and out of season.”

He said that he wanted to be “reproved, rebuked, and exhorted.”

Unfortunately, he refused to be rebuked about his lack of Sunday School attendance.

If he is still in the ministry, I hope that he has changed his mind about this.

Shame on the father who doesn’t see that he and his children are taking advantage of every opportunity to hear the word of God, whether preached or simply taught.

Teaching is that part of the ministry in which the Word of God, or more particularly the Lord Jesus, is patiently and carefully revealed.

It may lack some of the same dynamics that are contained in preaching,

But it doesn’t have to be any less enthusiastic.

It can be more detailed, more personal, more illustrated, and more general.

It is often the foundation upon which the preaching of the Word is built.

When a boxer goes into the ring against an opponent, he has to carry with him a number of techniques.

For example, if he never punches the body, he’ll likely never get to punch the other man’s nose.

And unless he punches with his left hand, then he’ll probably never land his right.

Teaching and preaching are the left and right punches of the Bible church.

And of course, THE PRIMARY SUBJECT of this teaching and preaching must be the Lord Jesus.

What the verse actually gives us is Jesus’ name and one of His titles.

You might say that we are to teach and preach Jesus’ deity, humanity and personality.

We are to teach and preach “Jesus.”

I have tried in the past to make it a point never to call our Saviour simply “Jesus.”

I’ve even mentioned that publically.

But I’ve since reconsidered that policy.

First, because “Jesus” was and still is my Saviour’s name.

And secondly, because quite often the Bible writers and preachers simply denote Him as “Jesus.”

But I still more often than not call him “the LORD Jesus” or something similar to that.

He is not our “good buddy,” or just the Galilean carpenter.

He is the LORD JESUS CHRIST, the Son of God, the Messiah, the Saviour.

But there is a human aspect of the Saviour, and His Name is “Jesus.”

“When fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law.”

He had a mother just as Patriarch Joseph did, and he had jealous brothers just as Joseph did.

He was tempted in all points, as we are, but he didn’t give in to those temptations.

The fact that Jesus was a human being, much like you and me, is an important doctrine.

That fact is absolutely necessary to our redemption.

“There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death. For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh.”

In many ways it is harder to PREACH Jesus than it is to TEACH Jesus.

But He must be taught.

On the hand, it is very easy to PREACH Jesus, “the Christ.”

This means that He is “the anoint one.”

To understand the Christ properly, one much see that He is prophet, priest and king; each office of which commenced with an anointing.

And each of those terms take us into unfathomable depths of thought and revelation.

They can, and probably will be taught and preached throughout eternity.

Together, “Jesus Christ,” is the Saviour.

“Neither is there salvation in any other, for there is none other name under heaven, given among men whereby we must be saved.”

A person might study and learn music until he is an expert in theory, the history of music and the actual making of music with a dozen different instruments.

But when that person dies, all the knowledge that he will have gained in music will forever be lost.

It’s not that there won’t be music in Heaven, but I imagine that it will be of a celestial variety unique to Heaven itself.

But if that man learns Jesus Christ, through applying himself to the teaching and preaching of Christ, he will take that knowledge into eternity with him.

In fact that knowledge will be the key that unlocks eternity for him.

“And daily in the temple, and in every house, they ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ.”

The third thing that is revealed as a part of the character of the church was the PLACE of their ministry.

We can look at this verse with a very specific eye, or we can look at it standing back just a bit.

They taught and preached Jesus Christ in the Temple.

As we have seen, the Apostles liked to speak to the crowds that gathered in Solomon’s Porch.

It was a long narrow colonnade that gave some protection from the weather.

Huge crowds could gather under that canopy

And with the roof above it, the acoustics might have been pretty good.

It was there that the apostles had preached on several occasions,

And it was there that they had been arrested.

I’m sure that they had both preaching and teaching “services” there.

But perhaps the Lord is making a more general statement than referring to the literal place.

This might simply be saying that the church and the apostles had public gatherings of some sort.

I don’t want to imply that the temple became their “church house.”

But this could very well be saying that they met regularly in Solomon’s Porch for public services.

One commentator said that they met every morning & every evening at the time of the daily sacrifice.

In that way, it would be equivalent to the regular services of Calvary Independent Baptist Church.

I’m sure that they had more public services than we have, and maybe that says something about us.

But they did have public services.

In addition to the meetings in the temple, they also had more personal & private meetings in people’s homes.

The question that this verse doesn’t answer is whether this is to be confined to the homes of the Christians or not.

If it’s speaking of the same thing as Acts 2:46 then it’s talking about the homes of the saints.

“And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house,

Did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart.”

I rather think that it does.

I was talking to our Missionary Tim Parrow last week, and he was talking about one of his services.

He said that one of the Mexican couples asked him to come to their house for the Sunday night Bible study.

Unfortunately they share an apartment or trailer with another man,

Who has shown very little interest in the things of the Lord.

In fact this other man lives in open immorality.

During the service that Sunday night, that man was sitting there listening to the Bible study, when one of his girl friends knocked on the door.

He invited her in, but instead of asking her to sit in the service with him, they went into his bedroom while the Bible was being taught not more than 20 feet away.

Bro. Parrow said that it was a very uncomfortable situation, and he doesn’t plan on having services in other people’s homes again.

I think that the church met in the temple and in the homes of many, if not all, of the church members.

Together the words “temple” and “every house” indicate that the church had both public and private preaching and teaching services.

And WHEN did these service take place?

“And daily in the temple, and in every house, they ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ.”

The word “daily” means exactly what you’d expect it to mean.

But I think that we can say that it means approximately the same thing as “constantly.”

With that many members and that many qualified teachers and preachers, I think that it is probable that they could have had multiple and multiplied services.

Would that be difficult to manage? Probably.

Would it be evil or wrong? Absolutely not.

It appears to me that the saints in Jerusalem in those early months took their Christianity very seriously.

By that I mean that their jobs, recreations and educations became secondary.

I think that they were probably doing something WITH the church or FOR the church every day.

They were changing their schedules, maybe skipping meals in order to spend time with the Apostles and other teachers.

It appears that they couldn’t get enough of the things of the Lord.

If Acts 5:42 was given to us to show us something about that first church,

What do you suppose is supposed to be the norm – frequent or infrequent meetings?

What do you suppose that John or Philip might say if they had an opportunity to spend a month with us?

Compared to the early church, don’t the Lord’s churches of the last days appear to be Laodicean?

“And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God;

I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot.

So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.

Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked:

I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich; and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear; and anoint thine eyes with eyesalve, that thou mayest see.

As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent.

Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me.

To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne.

He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches.