Do you remember when Peter was accosted by a young lady in the courtyard at the High Priest’s palace?
This was not long after he took a sword and tried to cut off a man’s head.
When this woman accused him of being a disciple of Christ, he lied and denied.
That was the epitome of cowardice.
And now, just a couple of month’s later, we see an entirely different kind of heart in this man.
It raises an interesting question:
Are there different kinds of courage, or is it merely that courage can come from different sources?
Oooh, look at the big fisherman, with the sword in his hand, standing beside his hero – Jesus.
But surround him with people not quite so friendly, and take away his stick, he becomes a wimp.
But now look at him.
Isn’t there a kind of courage which is nothing but foolish impudence?
What makes a person high on drugs jump off buildings?
No, it’s drugs.
Aren’t there other forms of courage that are mental and spiritual.
In a prison camp there may be tough marines who have the courage to fight their guards.
But at the same time they are strong enough to resist the mental torture applied against them.
Let’s think about the courage of the Apostles and try to apply it to ourselves.
As I’ve said several times, I don’t know how the idea to heal the lame man came into Peter’s head.
I am sure that it came from the Lord, but whether there was miraculous revelation, or not, I can’t tell you.
But whether the Lord Jesus told the Apostles to find this specific man and give him his legs,
I don’t know.
But then again it really doesn’t matter.
Had the disciples been doing miracles like this before the crucifixion? Possibly.
It took faith.
And I think that we can see that in some ways courage and faith blend together.
Has there ever been greater human courage than risk-all service for God?
Secondly, when the crowds gathered in wonder and amazement, Peter began to preach.
To pick up the Bible in order to address a crowd of Christian friends, is an awesome experience.
But to preach the truth of God to a crowd who are antagonistic to the truth, can be terrifying.
This sermon is very similar to what he said in chapter 2 and what he will tell the Sanhedrin.
It makes me think that these were things that he had been mulling over in his mind,
But that they weren’t organized into a specific sermon.
Peter told them the truth, some of the truth, but nothing but the truth.
He told them that the Messiah had come to purchase redemption.
He told them that He had been buried, but that He had been raised from the dead.
And then he told them to repent and believe the good news of salvation.
Have you ever told someone that they were worse than a liar?
Have you ever accused someone of murderer?
This sort of accusation has gotten a lot of people murdered themselves.
This took courage.
Judging from subsequent persecutions, I don’t believe that the disciples fought back or were crying and begging for mercy when they were arrested.
Their courage wasn’t the kind that came with a sword or big stick.
They were convinced that if their Saviour could suffer and win, they could suffer as well.
These men had courage to face the consequences of their earlier courage.
And by the way, were they the only ones arrested that day?
But verse 14 says that the healed man was standing beside them at their trial the next morning.
Of course I’m not saying that this needs to be confined to the Christian.
Did Peter and John do anything wrong? No.
Were they guilty of a crime? Possibly.
It could have been illegal for someone un-ordained by the Sanhedrin to hold a public meeting like this.
But do you think that these disciples concerned themselves about this?
Second, the Saviour had done the same sort of thing/
And third, what they were doing was for the true benefit of everyone involved.
They had a courage far greater than any governmental threat that might have been laid against them.
They had somehow acquired the courage of John the Baptist.
Do you know what Admiral David Farragut said at the Battle of Mobile Bay?
Peter gave the men of the court their appropriate titles.
It’s possible to tell people the truth and still do it with respect.
And boldness and courage don’t give us an excuse to become like the people we are facing.
In fact courage should make us more like our courageous Master.
Peter points out that the miracle was “a good deed.”
It took a man from the streets and brought him into the temple.
It shrunk the welfare rolls by at least one name.
It increased the alms giving power of the city.
And Peter used that fact to try to disarm the attack against him.
His courage was also to the point.
“You want to know by what name or authority this man has been made whole.
He might have couched his words a little and said only – “Jesus Christ,” or even “The Lord Jesus Christ.”
Peter was faithful to his God-given responsibility and opportunity.
The Lord had arranged for him and his partner to stand in the center of Jewish power.
There were surrounding him some of the most intellectual, religious and in some cases some of the best men in the nation.
If these men could be won to the truth, then theoretically, the whole city could be turned around.
Peter knew that he may never have this opportunity again, so he gave them all that he had.
Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.”
The Bible clearly says that Peter was filled with the Holy Ghost – v. 8.
This is how he quickly grew a backbone.
In Gethsemane Peter could impetuously swing a borrowed sword.
It took but a moment and required little thought or skill.
And if he had, things might have been very different.
All that he had at the moment was courage.
This was the courage of God Himself.
This is courage that will not be mis-spent, or given without good reason.
This courage is linked to the Word of God, and so it doesn’t return unto the Lord void.
This was not Peter; it was the Holy Spirit.
They expected to use their position and power to bring these two fishermen to their knees.
They had, in the past, made grown men cry.
And they may have had to compete with the Romans, but they still condemned men to death.
But in this case, the Holy-Spirit-inspired courage of John and Peter made the Sanhedrin sit in awe.
And then they recognized and acknowledged that these men had drawn from a special pool of strength and courage – the Lord Jesus.
This was the sort of behavior they had seen in Christ Himself on a great many occasions.
They had killed the Shepherd, but now the sheep were becoming shepherds.
And as a result, they were so dumbfounded that they could hardly speak.
Very quickly Peter and John went right back to the work of evangelizing.
Isn’t this kind of courage one of the things that we are so lacking in these last days?
Isn’t this a part of the Laodicean problem?
Isn’t this a part of our problem?
It’s not a lack of knowledge, or even boldness.
It’s a lack of the power of the Holy Spirit which hurts us so badly.